Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 05:36

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Brewers Move Aaron Civale To Bullpen - MLB Trade Rumors
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
When the mind leaves the body - scientists investigate the incredible phenomenon of OBEs - Earth.com
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ray Dalio: ‘We should be afraid of the bond market’ - CNN
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia returning to U.S. to face criminal charges - Axios
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How do I seduce my sister? (I am an Indian) I want to have sex with her.?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: